On 12/2/05, Poor, Edmund W <Edmund.W.Poor(a)abc.com> wrote:
The emotional cost - not to mention the time cost - of stopping
a fellow contributor from directing abusive language at
another contributor has always been rather high, but it has
reached a new high of late.
By defending SlimVirgin against what FuelWagon HIMSELF conceded
was an "accusation" (his words), I find myself hauled before the
arbitration committee. I am told that I must say something in
MY DEFENSE, with dark hints of un-mentioned adverse consequences
to me if I just leave it alone.
For what its worth, FuelWagon has now turned Jayjg's ArbCom candidate
question page into his own personal battleground. FuelWagon's
"questions" span five sub-sections, have dozens of diffs and are filled with
endless rhetorical statements. However, this doesn't even begin to compare
with the 16 section response to his RfC a while back: (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/FuelWagon_2).
Ed's right, the system's not working here.
Carbonite