It is a fact that a linked image cannot be put back
into the article by
the browser, but an inlined image *can* be turned into a link or
placeholder by the browser.
In fact it is theoreticly posible to turn a link back into an image
It is a fact that the decision to link images is a
matter of individual
taste; there is nothing intrinsically unencyclopedic about the content
which certain individuals are proposing to separate from the articles on
grounds of their own personal taste, and no encyclopedic purpose is served
by degrading the encyclopedia in this way.
It follows that the proposal to link boob pictures is an overreaction to a
personal distaste for boob pictures rather than an encyclopedic necessity.
Can you prove it degrads the enclyopedia?
--
geni