[WikiEN-l] Why linking an image gives less choice to the reader

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Why linking an image gives less choice to the reader
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Why linking an image gives less choice to the reader
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 4/17/05, Tony Sidaway <minorityreport at bluebottle.com> wrote:
> Rebecca said:
> > The reader is *not* free. The reader is given a choice to either go to
> > a patently ridiculous extreme, and manually enable each image, or to
> > have it thrown in their face regardless. This is opposed to the awful
> > (and one-off) strain that clicking one link would cause to the poor
> > person who really must see the autofellatio picture.
> 
> We appear to have a difference of opinion on the ease of operation of
> modern browsers such as Internet Explorer and Firefox.  As a person who
> often uses both in this mode I can assure you that it's neither extreme
> nor ridiculous.  It's very sensible and it solves the problem totally.
> 
I can't get this to work in firefox (maybe I'm computer illiterate).
Works fine in  IE, but FF doesn't have a rightmousebuttonclick to show
image inline (when image downloads are off). New FF downloaded
yesterday.

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] Why linking an image gives less choice to the reader
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] Why linking an image gives less choice to the reader
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]