On 4/16/05, Tony Sidaway <minorityreport(a)bluebottle.com> wrote:
Puddl Duk said:
The fallacy in your reasoning is to compare browsing without images to
linking. Browsing without images is not an acceptable choice to most
people (I think) and shouldn't be used as a comparison to something
that is an acceptable choice to most people (as evident in the votes on
autofelletio).
Could you explain what you mean by "browsing without images"? I don't
think it resembles what I have described in any way.
Ok, requiring the right mouse button extra click to see any image. Not
an acceptable choice for most people and therfore shouldn't be
compared to linking, which is an acceptable choice to most people.
I object to taking away the community's right to decide what images to
use or not (if they happen to be objectionable), just because browers
are able to do what you say.