Whose workplace? I know a couple who who work in a
sex-toy shop. Their
work involves using words like "clitoris" and "fellatio" (though
they'd
almost certainly use earthier terms) all day.
I think we all know what is being refured to
Attempting to reduce Wikipedia to some kind of lowest
common denominator
of inoffensiveness is just as absurd on the grounds of "being work-safe"
as it is on the grounds of "being child-safe". It is an impossible
goal; but attempting to pursue it can cause untold harm to the project
in the form of chilling effects, irreconcilable disputes, and biased
coverage.
Evidence?
Wikipedia doesn't need censorious categorization.
We are getting on
_just fine_ without it. Speculations of the sort, "If we don't put up
some kind of censorship, we could get sued!" are the "Niger yellowcake"
of this discussion -- a nonexistent threat that is being pounded on to
justify a preexisting agenda.
Evidence? Are you a lawer? Are you giving your formal legal opion?
--
geni