[WikiEN-l] Re: WP in UK press

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] WP in UK press
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] WP in UK press
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

In message <000501c498b8$0e944920$d4000450 at Galasien>, Charles Matthews 
<charles.r.matthews-XZoyATsUNX5Wk0Htik3J/w at public.gmane.org> writes
>A positive article 'Wiki's wacky but it works' in today's London Observer,
>Business section, by John Naughton who typically writes on Internet topics.
>It takes the line that WP is good at 'self-healing', and is generally better
>(more comprehensive) than Britannica Online.
>
>Charles

Link at 
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,1302435,00.html

-- 
Arwel Parry
http://www.cartref.demon.co.uk/

• Previous message: [WikiEN-l] WP in UK press
• Next message: [WikiEN-l] WP in UK press
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]