On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:28:42 -0800, Stan Shebs <shebs(a)apple.com> wrote:
Mark Pellegrini wrote:
"Sometimes particular articles attract
several edit warriors, and often it's
two or three against one. If that one person "uses up" his three reverts,
the others still have several to go before they are also banned."
That's the whole idea of the 3 revert rule. If multiple people
are reverting you, and no one is coming to help, then you're
probably in the wrong.
Or you need a bigger posse... :-) It's only a matter of time
before some POV warrior thinks of hiring those ad-clickers in
India to help with the insta-reverting---oops sorry for
suggesting the idea! :-)
Stan
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I suggest that there will most likely be problems with rigidly
enforcing the 3RR, but I'm sure we can find solutions to those too,
and I think the new problems (if there indeed are any) will be better
than the current situation of some looney getting away with insanely
repeatedly reverting.
Zoney
--
~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...