[WikiEN-l] Re: 3RR policy change

Sun Nov 14 19:58:28 UTC 2004

At 09:40 AM 11/14/2004 -0500, JAY JG wrote:
>The issue that I'm talking about is when an editor does a significant 
>re-work of part of an article (say, re-wording or adding a number of 
>sentences) while simultaneously reverting other parts of the article, in 
>order to do a revert while being able to claim that they are doing 
>substantive edits.

The 3RR doesn't have to be perfect, IMO, it just has to be better than what 
we've got now. At least this will make POV warriors hav eto work more to 
fight their revert wars, which should help reduce their number. Nobody 
likes to work :).