This is Paul Vogel who is a hairbreath short of a 1 year ban. He has only
hours, perhaps minutes to go. See [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Paul
Vogel]].
Fred
From: David Gerard <fun(a)thingy.apana.org.au>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 20:39:45 +0000
To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] three revert rule and quickpolls
On 05/06/04 13:40, KNOTT, T wrote:
The general consensus appears to be the
quickpolls do not appear to work in
the case of violations of the three revert rule. Fair enough. So what do we
do now? I would like admins to have the power to 24hour block someone who
violates this rule, once they have received a warning. I personally can't see
any situation where someone would have a legitimate reason to revert more
than three times in a day.
Vandalism - protect the page.
Um what else? I can't think of anything. What does everyone else think?
That's a sweet thought, but 24.45.99.191 has been going hogwild
with (a) spamming large slabs of text across the place (b) altering
archives of talk pages yesterday and today. I put it on the
Vandalism page, but it doesn't seem to warrant any action. Just
what does it take for an anon IP vandal to get blocked?
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l