Catherine Munro wrote:
I'll admit, my editing tends to go in spurts: I'll spend a day or two
creating swathes of new text (creating or greatly expanding articles)
-- then I'll spend another three to ten days doing "housecleaning" -
typo patrols, Cleanup pages, disambiguation, lately the Orphaned
Categories page. Why? Because I hope against hope that the major
contributions I made will be at least be noticed to the extent that
someone fixes a typo or adds an external link, and I wait, patiently
checking my watchlist, for a few days before I'm convinced (and
discouraged) that a new article has vanished into the ether. It
certainly feels like the housework gets more credit; at least, I'm
more likely to get feedback when I clean up someone else's article.
(I know, I know about article ownership.) I'm not exemplary about
complimenting people either (and it's always easier to do so via the
edit summary than actually going to their user page), but I'll make
more of an effort. I just wanted to add my two cents -- I've been a
steady editor for a year and a half, and I know exactly what others
are saying about feeling like giving up sometimes because no one
notices what you do unless you're a troll, or deliberately seek out
controversial areas, or participate in every policy discussion.
I know what you mean - sometimes new articles generate interest from
other people, sometimes not. I've written a bunch of stamp stuff
partly in the expectation that there would be visitors coming because
of WP mentions in the philatelic print media, but there haven't been
many, so realistically I'm doing it for my own entertainment right now.
Also, I've found that it may be several months before anybody "notices"
new material, so I think of those as seeds planted without knowing the
germination period. Even if it takes a year, WP is still further ahead
because of the bits I added before.
Stan