[WikiEN-l] libertarian

Tue Jun 15 03:15:46 UTC 2004

> This user has posted as LibertarianAnarchist (LA), Democrate2003, 
> and Conradx, and I suspect most recently as Romanwarrior, 
> Fatalvenom, and maybe one other (I forget). 

This is a disgusting lie from you. I've used just one id or occassionally, none when I forget to log in. 
Facts are on my side. I don't play dirty unlike you. If you have evidence of me posting with many ids, please present it here.

> Of course, he vociferously denies using this army of
> sockpuppets.

Your crude allegation above is the same manner in which you analyze your "facts." 

> His main goal appears to be to push a Hindu nationalist
> POV. He has gone after many other pages, but this is the one where 
> he was most active. ([[Babri Mosque]] is another.)

You are the one pushing the White Supremacist POV. I am neither religious nor a nationalist. I have stated facts in an academic manner. You googled your way through and displayed your ignorance. A bunch of ignoramuses writing an encyclopedia is bound to end up with rubbish.

According to you, I made up the claim about VR Krishna Iyer being a Communist. Now that I have posted proof about his message to the organization called Mumbai Resistance (I bet youare so ignorant that you have never heard of it), it proves that I am right and you are ignorant.

> On Talk pages, he called everyone who disagreed with him either a
> communist or (later) a racist.

You were the one who started throwing labels. Even in this mail, you try labelling me a "Hindu Nationalist." Why do you complain when I call you the equivalent of that term? At least I give facts while you learn from my posts.

> His rhetoric on [[Mount Everest]] was particularly wild, and some 
> was repeated on the mailing list, as is now happening again. 

Your statement is idiotic. I was the one to point out that the first person to figure out that the peak was the highest was a brilliant mathematician named Radhnath Sikdar.

You and other ignorant fools first refused that this was true, but when you Googled, you found that I was right (because my knowledge base is vastly superior to yours). Then you moved it down so that it isn't visible. You did this because you couldn't tolerate the fact that someone who is not a White can achieve something.

At that time, we had an exchange where you accepted that you would publicly agree that you were a fool if Radhanath Sikdar had indeed done what I claimed. According to you, Everest "discovered" the peak and made the calculations all by himself.

Even now you seem to be in a state of denial. What a loser.

> He also throws in vicious anti-Americanism from time
> to time, as all have seen. These accusations are utterly irrational
> and completely unconnected to what anyone ever said.

Vicious hatred of Indians and Hindus is acceptable? e.g: throwing the label "Hindu nationalist" when you cannot counter using facts.

> A consensus to ban him was forming before he suddenly disappeared,
> temporarily it would seem.

You are lying. Angela and BCorr contacted me asking me to desist from posting while they mediated. Out of respect for their request, I stopped posting.

> As for the "Indian kid", I assume that is a reference to 
> User:Arvindn, an excellent contributor who used his knowledge of 
> India to try to find balance on disputed articles. 

Either VRKI is a Communist or not a Communist. Striking a balance on this is foolish. Which is what you did. It shows your idiocy. Nothing more, nothing less.
If you dispute it, use my post on VR Krishna Iyer's message of support to Mumbai Resistance.

> In the midst of the Gujarat edit war, Angela stepped in to ask for a
> resolution, eventually leaving it to Bcorr to mediate, which he did 
> by building a new article from the ground up. 

He didn't mediate. He agreed to go through point by point and discuss it out, but disappeared.

> Since it was a straightforward matter of LA forcing a POV, the 
> newly created article looked much like the NPOV one. Apparently LA 
> now believes we must all have been in it together.

It looks like something put together by ignoramuses. You are doing a sisservice to Wikipedia by posting Communist propaganda.

You have already lost it. My evidence this time cannot be disputed even by ignorant Americans clueless about VR Krishna Iyer. His message to a violent organization is proof enough.

> The spat over Iyer is because he has ties to communist groups 

but you are ignorant. This is a FACT. He was a Minister in a communist Government, after he was appointed a judge he had to keep away from Communist organizations as the law in India prohibits judges from having affiliation to political organizations and after he retired, he was the Presidential candidate of the Communist Party.

Most recently, he sent a message of support to Mumbai Resistance, an organization about which you learnt from me.

Again, if he is not a Communist, why not use his statements about USA as a fact? You are afraid that you will be exposed, aren't you? Don't worry, I shall edit a few articles using VRKI's statements as authoritative.

-libertarian

_______________________________________________
No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
Make My Way your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com