Well, I just voted 'yes', because I think the rule is excellent.
As usual, I'll engage in a few more days of annoying thought about the
matter before making any sort of proclamation linking this rule to
short-term bans.
--Jimbo
Daniel Mayer wrote:
Erik wrote:
He is needed to allow us instant tempbans in case
this
particular policy is violated, which I think would be a
useful option to have. There is almost no ambiguity
in edit wars.
What punishment to invoke is a separate matter from the policy - yes. But we
need to establish the policy first before we can punish people for violating
it. There are now 30 in favor and 8 against the rule = 79% in favor. Assuming
nobody votes against it, we still need two more votes in favor of the rule to
reach 80%.
But a policy without teeth is a bit useless. I agree.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:How_to_revert_a_page_to_an_earl…
-- mav
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l