Jimmy Wales wrote:
I tried. I let him come back as EofT for as long as we
could take it.
Part of the problem is that he will not email me, he will not join the
mailing list, he will not take part in dialog. He calls people
racists and control freaks. He postures about being interested in
policy, but then he always makes it perfectly clear that he intends to
ignore any policy that he doesn't agree with.
More than once, he has frightened people, including me, by making
remarks implying a personal level of intimidation. He likes to speak
of death for people who disagree with him, and says things like "There
is no co-operation with such people." "They were warned."
More than once, he has been accused of writing things that were
tantamount to death threats.
But this guy, well, he's in a category all his own, I'm sorry to
conclude, and I think there is very little chance of him learning how
to behave in a civilized fashion.
What has left me pissed off in this whole episode is not the simple fact
that EofT or his multiple incarnations were banned. Before the
User:Mediator page happened, my association with him was never more than
casual. I had no basis for either supporting or opposing his ban,
though I did respond to what seemed like speculative accusations until
I was satisfied that he had been properly identified. In the
discussions about the User:Mediator I was more concerned about the
obfuscation from the lawyer games that Alec was playing; these seemed to
be an attempt to kill the idea by introducing unnecessary complications.
I do, nevertheless, allow for the likelihood that User:Mediator might
have in due course proven himself disingenuous.
I visited the article on Ed Poor's recommendation on the mailing list.
Pursuant to the idea that it was a "role account" I added my idea in
goood faith, as did several others. The page has its own reason for
existence quite apart from the identity of the person who started it.
Martin and his vengeful colleagues have been so blinded by their hatred
of User:142... that they completely ignore anyone who contributed there,
and the whole subject of the discussion. It is clear that for them who
says something is a lot more important than what is said.
Ec