--- Ray Saintonge <saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Louis Kyu Won Ryu wrote:
Our favorite troll is raising Cain as
User:Mediator.
An unproven allegation. It would be just as fair if
I speculated that
you were a reincarnation of User:Clutch, or worse
that you were yourself
EofT trying to stir discord by stirring up
dissension.
I had thought the same thing!
<twilightzone>
But I considered another possibility: Maybe LKWR is in
fact 24/EofT disguised as a moderate voice--setting up
User:Moderator (after reading en:Wiki of course) as a
patsy/decoy personality. After demolishing
"Moderator" this would allow 24/EofT to re-join the
collective with a clean slate altogether! ~No one
would suspect~
</twilightzone>
> LKWR:However, the content he has posted and its
value
are beside the point.
EC:No! It is the point
Hahaha! Judge the messenger, or the message?
LKWR: The point
is, we've banned him three times.
EC: But only if it's the same person.
It may be hard to tell.
I suggest that
the usual technological measures
for dealing with edits
from banned users be employed. Pursuant to
existing policy, the pages
he created should be deleted and his other
contributions rolled back.
Hmmm! So what hidden agenda is there in this
attempt to suppress all
these mediation proposals?
It is strange that LKWR (supposedly new) seems so
familiar with existing policy, and his echoing of that
old (wrong) stigma--that any work under suspicion of
being by a banned user must be eradicated with extreme
prejudice-- is just too... whats the word....?
You have the burden of proof backward. It's up
to
the person making the
accusation to prove that he is. Innocent until
proven guilty.
This is exactly right Ray. Among the sharper tacks in
the sack you are!
~S~
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com