[WikiEN-l] Wikiquette "committee"

Fri Oct 3 16:22:57 UTC 2003

Vancouverguy wrote:

>If it is blatent JoeM-style POV that is the problem, there is really no need
>for arbitration. However in cases like the "Japanese Pornograpy" article,
>then arbitration is nessesary since not everyone may think that the article
>is actually POV.
>
>If we do decide to do this, there should be a "fast track" process that
>would be more efficient to go by when we are dealing with people like JoeM
>
Who is JoeM?  With 300,000 articles each of us necessarily only works on 
a small subset of the articles.  It's perfectly understandable that we 
may never have heard of a person raising hell over a completely 
different topic area.

Ec