Fred Bauder wrote:
That is the position they took. But in practice their
postion was that it
was "their article". They assumed a veto power (as a group) on how the
article was to be defined and what could be included in it.
It seemed a fairly sensible thing to me once I read about it.
Fred, if someone came along and sais the article "Fish" should also
mention "Saturn", we'd tell them it wasn't suitable. They might raise
similar criticisms of "veto power"