On Tue, 13 May 2003, Anthere wrote:
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 11:22:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Anthere <anthere6(a)yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] 172's sysop request and some random thoughts
--- Andrew Smith <ams80(a)cam.ac.uk> wrote:
While we're nominating people for sysop-hood
I'd
like to nominate Anthere, from what I've seen she
has been an excellent contributor. In light of the
below I'm not sure if she'd accept but I think it
would be polite to ask.
I thank you Andrew for that kindness. TC also
suggested that I asked 3 weeks ago. It was definitly
*not* something I wanted to be 3 weeks ago. For I
already have to help keeping clean two places.
But three weeks ago, a sysop was not was it is heading
to be in the near future.
So, I dunno.
If still needed, I'll second *her* (I'm not going to forget that anytime
soon!).
Meanwhile, I thank *JohnOwens* very much for having
deleted my images, one of which was copyrighted.
I suggest the ''Wikipedia:Personal subpages to be
deleted'' to be rethought for it seems to have low
usability.
I am still hoping to have the last of the *very*
interesting redirections of Fat Budda made 3 weeks ago
deleted in time.
I must confess, this afternoon, I have been thinking
the deletion could be sped up if I added some
obscenities in these blank pages. It seems vandalised
pages are deleted within a day, to compare with weeks
in due process and unknown time for blanked pages.
Similarly, when I mess a redirect, and have to ask for
the old location to be deleted to make the move back,
it might be more efficient to vandalize the page to be
deleted rather than putting it in the vote for
deletion page perhaps ?
Of course, this was just a wild thought :-) I would
not do such a thing, would I ????
I am an extremely reasonable woman :-)
Might work with some, but not on me; anything which isn't just-created, I
check its history, to make sure there's nothing that isn't clearly "patent
nonsense" in there either. If it isn't entirely patent nonsense, I'd
rather wait the week on VFD. So keep the cuss words to yourself. ;)
? is the plural of process processes ? maybe not
...?!?
Yes, it is.
--
John R. Owens
http://www.ghiapet.homeip.net/
Something far worse than the Shadows: reporters.
--Captain John Sheridan