[Foundation-l] moderation soft limit

Fri Oct 21 02:19:58 UTC 2011

topic was: Re: [Foundation-l] Letter to the community on Controversial Content

On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Andreas K. <jayen466 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:19 PM, David Levy <lifeisunfair at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Andreas Kolbe wrote:
>>
>> > Whether to add a media file to an article or not is always a
>> > cost/benefit not is always a cost/benefit question. It does not make
>> > sense to argue that any benefit, however small and superficial,
>> > outweighs any cost, however large and substantive.
>>
>> Agreed.  I'm not arguing that.
>>
>> Your replies seem indicative of a belief that my position is "Let's
>> include every illustrative image, no matter what."  That isn't so.  My
>> point is merely that we aren't bound by others' decisions.
>>
>> David Levy
>>
>
>
> David,
>
> I think we've reached about as much agreement in this stimulating exchange
> as we're likely to. I don't actually know what your position in any specific
> dispute around illustration would be; I don't think we've ever met in one of
> those on-wiki. I don't assume that we'd necessarily be far apart.

Does that mean this stimulating exchange is over!? ;-)
If not, could you both continue this discussion over on Meta,
Wikipedia or in a private email.

There was a 30 post per person monthly "soft" limit on foundation-l.
Is that still in place?
(if its changed, please update [[meta:foundation-l]])

Jayen, you're winning this month at 42 already ;-)

Thomas Morton is coming second with 35.

Jussi-Ville, Nemo, David, Kim, you're at 27, 27, 25 and 25 respectively.

The stats are here

http://www.infodisiac.com/Wikipedia/ScanMail/foundation-l.html
(thanks Erik Zachte)

Somehow David Gerard, Milos Rancic, Kim and Tobias Oelgarte made it to
96, 95, 89 and 83 posts last month.  Last month Thomas Dalton,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen and I posted 39, 37 and 35 times respectively,
and everyone else was under the 30 post soft limit.

Could the mods please enforce this a bit more.  I think it has been
detrimental to the list to allow so few people to dominate the
discussions here.

--
John Vandenberg