[Foundation-l] Letter to the community on Controversial Content

Sun Oct 16 19:34:42 UTC 2011

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 12:57 AM, ??? <wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> On 16/10/2011 19:36, Tobias Oelgarte wrote:
> > Am 16.10.2011 16:17, schrieb ???:
> >> On 16/10/2011 14:50, David Gerard wrote:
> >>> On 16 October 2011 14:40, ???<wiki-list at phizz.demon.co.uk>    wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Don't be an arsehole you get the same sort of stuff if you search for
> >>>
> >>> Presumably this is the sort of quality of discourse Sue was
> >>> complaining about from filter advocates: provocateurs lacking in
> >>> empathy.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Trolling much eh David?
> >>
> >>
> >> But thanks for showing once again your incapacity to acknowledge that
> >> searching for sexual images and seeing such images, is somewhat
> >> different, from searching for non sexual imagary and getting sexual
> images.
> >>
> > I have to agree with David. Your behavior is provocative and
> > unproductive. I don't feel the need to respond to your arguments at all,
> > if you write in this tone. You could either excuse yourself for this
> > kind of wording, or we are done.
> >
>
>
> Now you wouldn't be complainng about seeing content not to your liking
> would you. What are you going to do filter out the posts? Bet your glad
> your email provider added that option for you.
>
> Yet another censorship hipocrite.
>
>
>
I think he meant ignoring you, "I don't feel the need to respond to your
arguments at all". Which has also been an argument against the filter, I
don't see anything hypocritical in that.

Regards
Theo