[Foundation-l] Article Feedback Tool 5 testing deployment

Sat Dec 24 11:57:55 UTC 2011

Not...really. I'm not interested in getting more information on your
opinion *on* the AFT - we've got six emails on that so far in this thread -
but instead your opinion *of what the AFT is*. One possible explanation for
this divide is that you're misunderstanding what the tool is meant to do,
so I'd like to know what you think it is. So far you've instead said a lot
about how much you think it sucks, but nothing on what "it" is, and without
context your posts aren't, honestly, making that much sense.

On 24 December 2011 11:55, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <cimonavaro at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Oliver Keyes <okeyes at wikimedia.org>
> wrote:
> > The article feedback tool has nothing to do with approving edits, though.
> > Lets roll the conversation back; can you succinctly tell me how you
> > perceive the Article Feedback Tool, or what you know about it? That way
> > I'll know where you're coming from, and if there are any
> misunderstandings
> > which would explain why we're talking at cross-threads.
> >
>
> I freely admit I was being a bit flippant. But that was just because I knew
> I was in the right. Let us put it this succintly: "Being passive aggressive
> rather than aggressive about the way things are allowed as valid
> contributions
> to the encyclopaedia, is worse than being up front about it". Is that
> succint
> enough for you?
>
>
>
> --
> --
> Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

-- 
Oliver Keyes
Community Liaison, Product Development
Wikimedia Foundation