[Foundation-l] Wikimedia Foundation's 2010-11 Annual Report

Sat Dec 17 08:53:39 UTC 2011

Yaroslav M. Blanter, 17/12/2011 09:29:
>> May be just because they did not have anybody to translate to other
>> languages, as the composition of Transcom suggests?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Yaroslav
>>
>
> To correct myself, it just means that nobody did the translations

No. In the "highlights" case, it was about the languages the WMF asked a 
translation to,[1] that are the same languages in which the translated 
annual report summary is available in. Volunteers did translate more 
languages, but this doesn't change the fact that the WMF has chosen six 
preferred languages and it would be interesting to know how. :-)

Nemo

[1] 
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/translators-l/2011-October/001764.html