[Foundation-l] Regarding Berkman/Sciences Po study

Sun Dec 11 21:19:04 UTC 2011

Kim,

what about we stop naming and shaming and start thinking of how to solve problems instead? Let's sit down and discuss how to fix the various issues that have been raised on the lists, obtain community feedback and allow the researchers to resume the collection of responses they need to complete this study, which I understand you are not substantially objecting to. 

I appreciate your contribution on the talk page of the project and I am happy to host a conference call with Jerome some time this week if you wish to help us out.

Dario

On Dec 11, 2011, at 11:48 AM, Kim Bruning wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:27:34AM +0400, Yaroslav M. Blanter wrote:
>> I will do it right now, but to make it clear, we have 2 (TWO: twee, zwei,
>> deux, dos ...) RCOM members in total who are involved: Dario and Mayo. I do
>> not think anybody else would be able to answer any questions. 
>> And last contribution of Mayo in en.wp, from what I see, is from June.
>> So I guess it would be difficult to have two RCom members answering
>> questions.  
> 
> That is most unfortunate.
> 
>> Btw trolling on mailing lists is also not just a bad idea, it
>> goes against a basic policy for beginners.
> 
> With the greatest possible respect; I would suggest that the research
> committee does not have the kind of standing required to accuse others of
> disruptive behaviour, at this point in time.
> 
> sincerely,
> 	Kim Bruning
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l