[Foundation-l] WP being edited by lobbying firm

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] WP being edited by lobbying firm
• Next message: [Foundation-l] WP being edited by lobbying firm
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 6 December 2011 11:45, Thomas Morton <morton.thomas at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 to Fae
>>
>> This is outrageous. I would say COI notices + Disputed Neutrality notices.
>>
>
> Lets not get too dramatic.
>
> And anyway; if the purpose of doing such tagging is to punish them for
> their actions, well, then it's probably not a good thing to do...

I agree, let's not over-react. If you're going to go through and find
all the articles, how about reading them and making an assessment?
It's usually easy enough to spot a whitewashed article, however "dark"
their arts may be.

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] WP being edited by lobbying firm
• Next message: [Foundation-l] WP being edited by lobbying firm
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]