[Foundation-l] Funding Sources of Medical Research, was Misplaced Reliance, was Re: Paid editing...

Sun Nov 7 01:15:05 UTC 2010

Does not work for me,, because it unreasonably implies that references
without it are not so funded.

On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 7:56 AM, FT2 <ft2.wiki at gmail.com> wrote:
> Works for me.
>
> FT2
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at fairpoint.net> wrote:
>
>> > I think you have hit the nail on the head. Now we just need to drive it
>> > in
>> > the rest of the way.
>>
>> >>
>> >> These ethics standards serve the ideal of communicating reliable
>> >> knowledge to readers. This is one of the ideals that the Foundation was
>> >> built upon. They are also expressly designed to protect and enhance the
>> >> reputation of the publication that provides this information. While our
>> >> reputation will never be able to compare to those of top medical
>> >> journals,
>> >> I see no reason why we should fail to take reasonable and feasible
>> >> steps to
>> >> protect it to the extent that we can, following the example of the best
>> >> sources.
>> >>
>> >> Andreas
>> >>
>>
>> So, disclosure of funding source when available, included in
>> Template:Cite journal
>>
>> Fred
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> foundation-l mailing list
>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

-- 
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG