[Foundation-l] Misplaced Reliance, was Re: Paid editing, was Re: Ban and...

Mon Nov 1 06:12:34 UTC 2010

On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 00:02, David Goodman <dgoodmanny at gmail.com> wrote:
> But then it should also be said what studies were NOT funded by the
> manufacturer, and we do not know that,m because most journals do not
> specify--and almost none specified in the past.

Information about who funded research is just one more information
inside of an article. If it is possible to find that information, it
is good; if it is not possible, it is good, too. Wikipedia is not
about truth, but about verifiability. So, "study funded by X said
about Y that" seems as quite valid information, if available.