[Foundation-l] Board members positions toward Jimmy's last action

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] Board members positions toward Jimmy's last action
• Next message: [Foundation-l] Board members positions toward Jimmy's last action
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 9 May 2010 13:26, Samuel Klein <meta.sj at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:23 AM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:


>> The overriding question will be the editorial role of the board.

> The Board has no editorial role, on Commons or on any other Project,
> nunless you consider high-level goal-setting and prioritization ( like
> http://j.mp/wmfblp ) editorial.


Then (a) actions in the present case (b) Ting's express statements in
the present case do not match this. As such, you need to be addressing
the actions rather than just repeating "but our mandate doesn't allow
us to do what we so egregiously actually did."


- d.

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] Board members positions toward Jimmy's last action
• Next message: [Foundation-l] Board members positions toward Jimmy's last action
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]