[Foundation-l] FlaggedRevisions status (March 2010)

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] FlaggedRevisions status (March 2010)
• Next message: [Foundation-l] FlaggedRevisions status (March 2010)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 37-01--10 03:59 PM, William Pietri wrote:
> we think there are some interface changes are
> going to improve both the user experience and the value of the enwiki
> trial.

Why did it take this request from enwiki to have the UX aspect of
flagged revisions taken seriously?

This has been one of the main complaints about the implementation since
day zero. All other complaints I've heard have been regarding the idea,
not the implementation. The UX problems are real, yet were unaddressed
until very recently. Why? Will the Foundation be expending effort on
this using the now-permanent UX team?

- -Mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkuQKecACgkQst0AR/DaKHvQuQCfRtmdjuebACr8aPHVyRBcCZEQ
BIgAoNeUEPnZE9iR6TK3kPSnrTv4CrCn
=IS29
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] FlaggedRevisions status (March 2010)
• Next message: [Foundation-l] FlaggedRevisions status (March 2010)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]