[Foundation-l] Proposals re : sexual content on wikimedia

Fri May 22 12:16:19 UTC 2009

I concur. Getting an unsatisfactory response does not mean that you should
bang on about it incessantly.

- Chris

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 11:41 AM, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:

> 2009/5/22 Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com>:
> > 2009/5/22 private musings <thepmaccount at gmail.com>:
>
> >> Hi all,
> >> I saw this news item today;
> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8061979.stm
> >> and felt that it was tangentially related to the discussions on this
> list
> >> concerning sexual content on wikimedia - it's prompted me to make this
> reply
> >> anywhoo (both the story and the comments are worth reading, and I feel
> they
> >> deal with the 'baby' and 'bathwater' aspects reasonably well).
>
> > I think you've started enough threads here on this topic now. It is
> > clear that the community doesn't agree with you; this isn't going
> > anywhere. Please drop it.
>
>
> +1
>
>
> - d.
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>