[Foundation-l] [Commons-l] commons and freely licensed sexual imagery

Fri May 15 03:17:58 UTC 2009

fair enough, Pedro - I certainly don't want any weight, in terms of
argument, placed on my opinion that this matters - I'd much rather stick to
the substantive issues of the matter at hand.... it's more about discussing
wether or not it's a problem that wmf hosts pic.s of topless chicks on the
beach without their permssion.. and other assorted problems with explicit
sexual images being easily accessible on wmf projects.

cheers,

Peter
PM.

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Pedro Sanchez <pdsanchez at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:06 PM, private musings <thepmaccount at gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Re : Pedro - heh... I take your point - doesn't mean we shouldn't talk
> > about
> > the merits of the point at hand, though, no? If there's an improvement to
> > be
> > made, that's gonna be a good thing regardless of the opinion that it's
> also
> > important, I reckon....
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Peter
> >
>
> No, it doesn't meanthat.
> It means, if you're going to play the "the future of wikipedia is at stake"
> then you better backup your hand with arguments and evidence
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>