[Foundation-l] Licensing update roll-out

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] Licensing update roll-out
• Next message: [Foundation-l] Licensing update roll-out
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Erik Moeller<erik at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>
> Because the GFDL is only of interest to a minority of
> re-users,
...

If this is the Foundation's view, why did it opt to push for (hobbled)
dual-licencing going forward, instead of transitioning completely to
CC-BY-SA and retaining GFDL only for legacy content?

-- 
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain at gmail.com

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] Licensing update roll-out
• Next message: [Foundation-l] Licensing update roll-out
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]