[Foundation-l] Why don't we re-encode proprietary formats as Ogg?

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] Why don't we re-encode proprietary formats as Ogg?
• Next message: [Foundation-l] Why don't we re-encode proprietary formats as Ogg?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

2009/6/7 Platonides <Platonides at gmail.com>:
> David Gerard wrote:

> Isn't Firefogg good enough? That's the solution being developed.


Installing software is an extra step for the user, therefore bad.


>> ** though I fully expect people will now do so anyway

> IANAL but


See, told you!

Does anyone have an informed, official opinion on this matter?


- d.

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] Why don't we re-encode proprietary formats as Ogg?
• Next message: [Foundation-l] Why don't we re-encode proprietary formats as Ogg?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]