[Foundation-l] How was the "only people who averaged two edits a week in the last six months can vote" rule decided?

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] How was the "only people who averaged two edits a week in the last six months can vote" rule decided?
• Next message: [Foundation-l] How was the "only people who averaged two edits a week in the last six months can vote" rule decided?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Samuel Klein wrote (in two messages):

> >> *A wiki for book metadata, with an entry for every published 
> >> work, statistics about its use and siblings, and discussion 
> >> about its usefulness as a citation (a collaboration with 
> >> OpenLibrary, merging WikiCite ideas)

> I could see this happening on Wikisource.

Why could you not see this happening within the existing 
OpenLibrary? Is there anything wrong with that project? It sounds 
to me as you would just copy (fork) all their book data, but for 
what gain?

(Plus you would have to motivate why a copy of OpenLibrary should 
go into the English Wikisource and not the German or French one.)


-- 
  Lars Aronsson (lars at aronsson.se)
  Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] How was the "only people who averaged two edits a week in the last six months can vote" rule decided?
• Next message: [Foundation-l] How was the "only people who averaged two edits a week in the last six months can vote" rule decided?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]