[Foundation-l] mo.wikipedia.org

Fri Nov 14 11:47:20 UTC 2008

Hoi,
As it is it will remain in this way unless

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com>wrote:

> On 14 Nov 2008, at 11:30, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>
> > Because this is one of the most heavily fought battles that did not
> > result in a situation that is acceptable to all.
>
> Well, since "mo" is now deprecated, re-naming it "ro-Cyrl" can be done
> without really taking any decision. It's essentially cosmetic.
>
> > The issue is that the people behind the mo.wikipedia are not living
> > anywhere near the areas involved and they are not native speakers/
> > writers either. It would have been good when this thing had been
> > just deleted because the pain would have worn off. However, the
> > decision was that when a native speaker comes along, it can be
> > restarted...
>
> I don't understand. Is it to be deleted? Is it to be re-named? If not
> the former, then surely the latter.
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>