[Foundation-l] Stroop report

Mon Mar 24 00:01:08 UTC 2008

On 23/03/2008, Newyorkbrad (Wikipedia) <newyorkbrad at gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems to me that common sense should be used in this as in all
>  other matters. A 60-year-old photograph that has never been the
>  subject of any claim of ownership and which has been repeatly used in
>  multiple media around the world without challenge is freely usable in
>  any practical sense.

That would only work if the law made any sense, common or otherwise.