[Foundation-l] Volunteer Council - A shot for a resolution

Mon Mar 17 17:12:12 UTC 2008

Thomas Dalton wrote:
> On 17/03/2008, Chad <innocentkiller at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Looks like a typo to me. Perhaps "could take" was meant? And
>>  on that note, our freedom /was/ removed, in a sense. The idea of
>>  membership was revoked some time back.
>>     
> Yes, I meant "could take". I apologise to anyone offended by that
> unintentional accusation.
>
> The idea of membership was revoked? I didn't think the foundation ever
> had members, it was incorporated without them. What do you mean?
In the scramble to compose an e-mail it's  just as easy for Chad to use 
the wrong word as for you. :-)

"Rejected" might be more to the point than "revoked"

Ec