[Foundation-l] Voting suffrage criteria (established members should be able to vote)

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] Voting suffrage criteria (established members should be able to vote)
• Next message: [Foundation-l] Voting suffrage criteria (established members should be able to vote)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ryan wrote:
> For your particular case, I wouldn't support an exemption; while I certainly
> consider you an established community member, it's your fault alone that you
> scrambled the password and changed the e-mail details of your previous
> account.  It's like shredding your driver's license in a country or state
> that requires a driver's license to vote.
> 
> In general, I think that exceptions should certainly not be made once the
> election starts.  If any case-based issues should arise, perhaps they could
> be looked at before the election starts, but I can't think of any scenario
> where I would support an account being specifically exempted.
> 

If I read you correctly, you don't agree with my action, so even though
I can be verified
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Identification_noticeboard

and my old account will not log in, you thing I should not vote.  Smells
of retribution?  You argument makes no sense.  Try addressing my
suggested changes.

Thanks,
Jon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIXrSr6+ro8Pm1AtURAlFiAKDBX3FZz8n5dWyySqumQbpwJBtP5QCgipa+
rhD5K2BEF3Bk4bJqYCazA/s=
=Bgl+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] Voting suffrage criteria (established members should be able to vote)
• Next message: [Foundation-l] Voting suffrage criteria (established members should be able to vote)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]