[Foundation-l] Top posters

Tue Jun 3 16:21:07 UTC 2008

While that's mildly amusing, I think it is in poor taste.

Were I to choose to highlight something from the stats it would be the
participation from board and staff. I see Anthere and Mike Godwin high among
the top posters, and for most of May I was able to keep up without ignoring
too much stuff. My interpretation of that would be that we saw a far higher
signal-to-noise ratio for the month.

Brian McNeil

-----Original Message-----
From: foundation-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org
[mailto:foundation-l-bounces at lists.wikimedia.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Dalton
Sent: 03 June 2008 15:17
To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Top posters

On 02/06/2008, Milos Rancic <millosh at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Nathan <nawrich at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >  Milos Rancic 59  Anthony 56  Ray Saintonge 47  Thomas Dalton 47  White
Cat
>  > 46  GerardM 39  effe iets anders 39  Geoffrey Plourde 36  Mike Godwin
34
>  > Anthere 32  Dan Rosenthal 31  Birgitte SB 29  Mark Williamson 27  Jesse
>  > Plamondon-Willard 27  Pharos 25  David Gerard 23  Chad 23  Casey Brown
>  > 21  Michael
>  > Bimmler 20  Nathan 18
>
>
> Wow, I am the first :) And I don't think that I raise the number of my
>  emails... Oh, I see. Competition is not so strong anymore ;) With this
>  amount of emails, I would be seventh for April :)

I don't remember any major scandals in May - there was nothing much to
talk about. There needs to be some disagreement in order to get lots
of back-and-forth. Everyone agreeing that we're all very grateful for
the excellent job Florence did as board chair doesn't make for a
lengthy debate! Now, had she done a bad job, we could have had a
brilliant discussion about it. So basically, you should blame
Florence! ;)

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l