[Foundation-l] Next board meeting
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen
cimonavaro at gmail.com
Mon Feb 25 15:16:27 UTC 2008
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > My own suggestion would be that a treasurer who is an
> > appointed Board member would need to face the electorate not less than
> > six nor more than eighteen months after that appointment. The six
> > months should be enough time for him to put his mark on the job, and
> > show that he can communicate with the general membership.
>
> Why would an appointed member ever have to seek election? The point of
> appointed members is to get people with specific skills the board
> requires, the point of election is to get people that can represent
> the community. They are distinct goals, and you shouldn't try and mix
> them. (Of course, if a member of the community has the required skills
> and can fulfil both roles, that's great.)
>
I think if you look closely, the two members that were appointed, were
specifically not appointed with a renewable term, but appointed *until*
the next elections.
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen, ~ [[User:Cimon Avaro]]
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list