[Foundation-l] Ancient

Mon Apr 14 09:49:26 UTC 2008

So, then, being extremely active, as are you, Gerard, and this unnamed
person, is not a prerequisite to remaining a member of the committee?
Although I am sure it was not your intention, you made it seem (to me,
of course) as if all the wonderful work you do for the foundation is
expected and required of every single member of the committee.

Mark

On 14/04/2008, Jesse Martin (Pathoschild) <pathoschild at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:29 AM, Mark Williamson <node.ue at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >  I'm not trying to say that members should not be weighing in more with
>  >  their own opinions, but rather that if you consider the average
>  >  contribution to discussions of anybody besides Jesse and Gerard, it
>  >  seems rather easy a job.
>  >
>
>
> Several members of the committee are inactive, or cannot keep up with
>  the time required. It's because it's not an easy job that they're less
>  active, not the reverse. That's something I hope to change in the
>  future, but in the meantime decisions are nonetheless lengthily
>  discussed by the active members with the less active piping in.
>
>  (Keep in mind that posts from "—" are from a different member of the
>  committee who asked that their name be removed from the archives.)
>
>
>  --
>  Yours cordially,
>  Jesse Plamondon-Willard (Pathoschild)
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  foundation-l mailing list
>  foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
>  Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>