[Foundation-l] Release of squid log data

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] Release of squid log data
• Next message: [Foundation-l] UvA what they need in log data from the Wikimedia Foundation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Brianna Laugher wrote:

> The privacy policy appears to be written with community==editors in
> mind. Is it sensible to act as if our community includes readers?
> That's getting to be like, everyone who uses the web. That's rather
> above and beyond what I would expect our privacy policy to cover. If
> as Tim says 99% of the data is about readers, maybe we could release a
> public API to access reader data?

I don't understand this argument.  Why don't readers deserve privacy?
Why would we consider turning over detailed search and hit records of
all of our readers?  Doesn't anyone remember the AOL search data fiasco?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32)

iD8DBQFG7x6LvCEYTv+mBWcRApUeAJ47pYygq/gt65ABy+fRWigdLNOAzACdE5F7
f0sN2X3hb76hx179wVS6vn4=
=+EPf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

• Previous message: [Foundation-l] Release of squid log data
• Next message: [Foundation-l] UvA what they need in log data from the Wikimedia Foundation
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]