[Foundation-l] To -l or not to -l?

Wed Sep 12 20:07:37 UTC 2007

If there is a guidelines about that, it seems ComProj is the only that
follows it... :-S  I think it would be best if we just keep the -l, since
all the other ones have -l. :-)

On 9/12/07, Sean Whitton <sean at silentflame.com> wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> Some time ago it was posted onto this list that the Wikimedia mailing
> lists had been moved onto lists.wikimedia.org and, if I recall
> correctly, we were told that we should stop using -l on the end (of
> new lists) as this distinction didn't make sense anymore. When I
> created the ComProj mailing list, I just requested comproj@
>
> However, I am noticing that a lot of new lists are being created with
> -l. Yes, it is tempting, it is very much in my head to... but is there
> a consensus of which way to go? It seems to me that we should do one
> thing or the other. Or am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sean
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

-- 
Casey Brown
Cbrown1023

---
Note:  This e-mail address is used for mailing lists.  Personal emails sent
to
this address will probably get lost.