[Foundation-l] Unofficial stable version demo

Fri Oct 5 00:02:02 UTC 2007

On 10/4/07, David Goodman <dgoodmanny at gmail.com> wrote:
> reviewed or examined or checked would seem to be the English idiom,
> in any case, not sighted, But given the degree of scrutiny, I suppose
> we want something much much weaker.

You could call it what it is: "unreviewed" and "reviewed for
vandalism". But there doesn't seem to be anything which is terse,
precise, and understandable to the layman.

I prefer a distinction like "published" and "draft": it's terse and
instantly understandable but not very precise.