[Foundation-l] Do we need a Code of Participation?

Thu Nov 15 12:51:58 UTC 2007

Sure you reckon that you are completely off-topic?

Michael

On Nov 15, 2007 7:05 AM, Rob Smith <nobs03 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh, well thanks.  All one needs to do is "edit this page" on libel, and it
> can be improved.
>
>
> On 11/14/07, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Nevermind, I'm not going to argue this point any further, a) because
> > I don't care, and b) I'm referring to an immaterial point to your
> > complaint,  which is that you should have said libel.
> >
> > -Dan
> > On Nov 15, 2007, at 12:44 AM, Rob Smith wrote:
> >
> > > Well, that's a bad standard to set.  Because obviously that stands
> > > in marked
> > > contrast to all your stated policies, be they NPA & Civility, Dispute
> > > Resolution "in good faith," or even you own citation policies.
> > >
> > > On 11/14/07, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> You apparently missed the point of my statement by a wide margin
> > >> which was that they don't exist at all due to the medium.
> > >>
> > >> -Dan
> > >> On Nov 15, 2007, at 12:31 AM, Rob Smith wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> You're right, they are embalmed in an ArbCom decision, of which the
> > >>> presiding Arbitrator admits to errors, and has sought to remove.
> > >>>
> > >>> On 11/14/07, Dan Rosenthal <swatjester at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 'Slanders don't occur at all....
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -Dan
> > >>>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 9:53 PM, Rob Smith wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On 11/14/07, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 15/11/2007, Rob Smith <nobs03 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> When Am I gonna see action on my case?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Never?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - d.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Slanders don't have to be in mainspace in articles of notable
> > >>>>> people, they
> > >>>>> can occur in your Dispute Resolution processes against common
> > >>>>> editors.
> > >>>>> Ultimately, it is your name and reputation that must defended,
> > >>>>> knowing the
> > >>>>> facts, and allowing your policies and processes to be used to that
> > >>>>> way.
> > >>>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>>> foundation-l mailing list
> > >>>>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > >>>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
> > >>>>> foundation-l
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> foundation-l mailing list
> > >>>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > >>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
> > >>>> foundation-l
> > >>>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> foundation-l mailing list
> > >>> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > >>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
> > >>> foundation-l
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> foundation-l mailing list
> > >> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > >> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > foundation-l mailing list
> > > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > > Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>