[Foundation-l] Future Board election procedures and guidelines

Mon Jul 16 20:37:54 UTC 2007

2007/7/16, Andrew Gray <shimgray at gmail.com>:
> On 16/07/07, Anthony <wikimail at inbox.org> wrote:
>

> And whilst I do accept this isn't "about Danny", perhaps you will
> pardon this note: 29.2% of the community who registered an opinion
> thought that an outspoken ex-employee was worthy of a seat on the
> board. We appointed people on 30.1%. On the whole, the difference in
> votes between Frieda, Oscar, Michael and Danny was in the noise - it
> was virtually chance deciding which one of them won. There isn't
> overwhelming support there, but neither is there any kind of deep
> distrust.
>

Yes. And in fact the diffrences of the numbers of votes for Dany (no.
6) and Frieda (no. 3) is just 37 votes. It is just 0.88% of all
votes... I personally have a feeling that it was just a matter of luck
who won the election for 3rd possiton. The difference between Oscar
and Frieda is just 20 votes - it is less than 0.5% of votes...

-- 
Tomek "Polimerek" Ganicz
http://pl.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Polimerek
http://www.poli.toya.net.pl
http://www.ptchem.lodz.pl/en/TomaszGanicz.html