[Foundation-l] ..

Tue Jul 18 12:25:15 UTC 2006

I'm not so sure. There's only so much one (or all) can say about a
blank message. The only chance for the continuation of this thread
would be some kind of tangent. Open source and spam have been
mentioned, but no one took the bait. So, what will it be?

On 18/07/06, Sean Whitton <sean at silentflame.com> wrote:
> It's not unpleasant, this little conversation. We could keep going.
>
> On 18/07/06, valdelli at bluemail.ch <valdelli at bluemail.ch> wrote:
> > It could be... nothing else to do?
> >
> > Ilario
> >
> > ----Messaggio originale----
> > Da: messedrocker at gmail.com
> > Data: 17.07.2006 7.34
> > A: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List"<foundation-l at wikimedia.org>
> > Oggetto: Re: [Foundation-l] ..
> >
> > It's incredible how much conversation there is sorrounding a blank
> > message.
> >
> > On 7/17/06, Jeffrey V. Merkey <jmerkey at wolfmountaingroup.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
> >
>
>
> --
>         —Xyrael ~ <xyr>
>                 sean at silentflame.com | xyrael.net
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l at wikimedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>

-- 
Oldak Quill (oldakquill at gmail.com)