[Foundation-l] Enforcing WP:CITE the Soi case
daniwo59 at aol.com
daniwo59 at aol.com
Sat Dec 3 15:50:29 UTC 2005
Ridicule? No. I am simply disappointed that you can even make such a
statement. It shows me that we have very radically different ideas about what an
encyclopedia is. Providing correct information is not something I am willing to
compromise. I had hoped that this sentiment was shared by all of Wikipedia's
editors and contributors.
Danny
In a message dated 12/3/2005 10:46:04 AM Eastern Standard Time,
gerard.meijssen at gmail.com writes:
Hoi,
Why, you ridicule what I have said and I give a deserving answer. You
replied to a lengthy reply, I gave plenty of arguments. And this is all
you take out of it? You do not go into the arguments that were given.
>From my perspective in your previous post you had nothing to say.
Thanks,
GerardM
daniwo59 at aol.com wrote:
>
> If that is the attitude, then I really have nothing more to say here.
>
> Danny
>
> In a message dated 12/3/2005 10:34:43 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> gerard.meijssen at gmail.com writes:
>
> Hoi,
> Yes it is. Other sources can be wrong as well and as I mentioned before
> you would kill the goose that lays the golden eggs.
> Thanks,
> GerardM
>
>
> daniwo59 at aol.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Is it too much to ask that contributions to Wikipedia be correct? That
is
>> news to me.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l at wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-
More information about the foundation-l
mailing list