[Foundation-l] Enforcing WP:CITE the Soi case

daniwo59 at aol.com daniwo59 at aol.com
Sat Dec 3 15:50:29 UTC 2005


 
Ridicule? No. I am simply disappointed that you can even make such a  
statement. It shows me that we have very radically different ideas about what an  
encyclopedia is. Providing correct information is not something I am willing to  
compromise. I had hoped that this sentiment was shared by all of Wikipedia's  
editors and contributors. 
 
Danny
 
In a message dated 12/3/2005 10:46:04 AM Eastern Standard Time,  
gerard.meijssen at gmail.com writes:

Hoi,
Why, you ridicule what I have said and I give a deserving  answer. You 
replied to a lengthy reply, I gave plenty of arguments. And  this is all 
you take out of it? You do not go into the arguments that were  given. 
>From my perspective in your previous post you had nothing to  say.
Thanks,
GerardM

daniwo59 at aol.com  wrote:
>  
> If that is the attitude, then I really have  nothing more to say here. 
>  
> Danny
>  
>  In a message dated 12/3/2005 10:34:43 AM Eastern Standard Time,  
>  gerard.meijssen at gmail.com writes:
>
> Hoi,
> Yes it is.  Other sources can be wrong as well and as I  mentioned before 
>  you would kill the goose that lays the golden  eggs.
>  Thanks,
> GerardM
>
>
> daniwo59 at aol.com   wrote:
>   
>>  
>> Is it too much to  ask that contributions to  Wikipedia be correct? That 
is   
>> news to   me.
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing  list
foundation-l at wikimedia.org
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-


 



More information about the foundation-l mailing list