On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Rob Lanphier
<robla(a)wikimedia.org> wrote:
* Code review is falling back behind. As of
right now, we have 38
unreviewed revisions in core (phase3), and another 189 unreviewed
revisions in extensions. That's up from the 4 core + 28 extensions on
February 4. We basically let code review get back out of hand as
we've turned our focus toward bugfixing in deployment.
That was last week. This week, it's even more grim:
* New (unreviewed):
** core: 49
** extensions: 242
* Fixme:
** core: 8
** extensions: 19
The graph:
http://toolserver.org/~robla/crstats/
The trendline doesn't look good. What can we do to get back on the right
track?
With what percent of time devoted to code review? There's a 20% rule, isn't
there? Is that being followed? Is the percent higher? Lower? That's surely a
useful metric when looking at a problem like this. Because code review is
ultimately about... doing code review. wikitech-l has no secret answer.
MZMcBride