At 18:42 26/09/2016, Aran wrote:
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64I developed a
MediaWikiLite system
many years ago which worked
reasonably well. It was for having a wiki on a memory stick that
included the content and ability to edit it in the field without net
access.
Yes. Also easy back-up and replication. With extenbots around. Then
the various wikilites being networked.
It ran on SQLite and use Nanoweb, a web-server
written in PHP to
reduce dependencies further.
It's very out of date now, but may be helpful:
https://www.organicdesign.co.nz/MediaWikiLite
Thanks. I had a read and will come back to it as I probably set-up a
working group.
Best
jfc
On 26/09/16 11:00, Jefsey wrote:
The personal way I am using wikimedia as an
SQLite textbase I can
X\Ú[HÛÜKØ@ckup from machine to machine and modifiy through
external bundled applications leads me to
consider there is a need for
HÚZÚ[YYXH\Ù\L HÛÛ\]XHÒRÒS]H[egrated/maintained
solution set.
K\ÈÛÛY][Èike that been
investigated in the
pastHÛÝ[H@nterested by comments on the idea?
Ë[ÛÈXÝ]H\proach that can best help users and possibly
wikimedia dévelopment?
HÝH]\ÈH]ÛÜÙY[]YX[Ürofessionnal I am interested in
][KXYÙ[ÜY[Y[terwares and would like to investigate
"wikilite" networking capabilities
(both about what networked
architectures could bring, and aboout capacity based content
security/protection).
Thank you for your attention.
@st
jfc
×××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××××À_________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l