On 12/8/06, Rob Church <robchur(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
As I've mentioned before in this thread, that
isn't the whole case;
rollback *will* revert more than one edit where there's a sequence of
edits by the same contributor.
In that respect, it's much more powerful.
Ok, given that "undo" is not "rollback", and that "undo" is
more
user-friendly than "manual revert", can "undo" be enabled for all
users for the most recent revision? And we'll keep calling it "undo"
and insist that it's totally different from "rollback" and everyone
will be happy, right?
I don't see a particular reason not to show it; it would just be the
same as clicking 'edit' on the previous revision. :)