Timwi &lt;timwi(a)gmx.net&gt; writes: Then go for art-tp.wikipedia.org, but that's cryptic and tp.wikipedia.org is simply misleading and sooner or later 'tp' will become an official ISO-639 language code. These two-letter codes are precious. Better use a long name now for a fun project than asking for trouble in the future. "art-" is a official recommendation. In the TP http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/translation/ we have "art-lojban". -- | ,__o | _-\_<, http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/ | (*)/'(*)

Ralesk Ne'vennoyx wrote: Shame those sources found by Google don't have like half of the codes. Klingon and Ido and Lojban (why jbo?!) definitely have their 3-letter codes. Sorry.

Ralesk Ne'vennoyx wrote: Seeing as Klingon has tlh, which is equally unobvious to people who don't know Klingon, "jbo" shouldn't seem too unplausible. Timwi

KE> This is not the right approach; if there is no code assigned KE> and if it is an artificial language, use "art-" as a prefix: KE> art-toki-pona.wikipedia.org I thought 'x-' was the recommended prefix. 'x-toki-pona'. On this subject: isn't the toki pona Wikipedia just going to have, like, 12 articles? It's a minimal conlang language that explicitly renounces talking or writing about complicated, technological, or other 'bad' subjects. ~ESP -- Evan Prodromou &lt;evan(a)wikitravel.org&gt; Wikitravel - http://www.wikitravel.org/ The free, complete, up-to-date and reliable world-wide travel guide